But the problem is that times change. an uncertain scenario According to opinion polls, the intention to vote for the approval of the constitutional text has fallen consistently. By now, all the polls show a slight edge for rejection. Furthermore, the polls show that the main reason for this attitude stems from the negative judgment of the way the Convention works, 55% of those consulted mention distrust in the constituents as the main source of rejection and 40%, the general disagreement with approved proposals.
To a large extent, this negative judgment is due to the various performances carried out during the debate by some conventionalists. What at first seemed picturesque and striking has ended up south africa phone number list generating a certain uneasiness. On the other hand, for several of these referents it was important to present maximalist, striking and symbolic proposals, even if they did not have the votes in the Convention (for example, a conventional one proposed to dissolve all the powers of the State and replace them with assembly bodies). The media have amplified these performative acts and the most insane proposals, which have also been reinforced by disinformation campaigns on social networks.
Now that the deliberation process is over, the preparations for the campaign for the plebiscite begin and the political forces have been ordering their “approval” or “rejection”. The proposed text has ended up reflecting the vision of two thirds of the Convention. A much broader vision than the cartoons that have dominated public debate. In the field of approval there seems to be a certain consensus that it will be necessary to add more spokespersons capable of installing in public opinion a text that moves away from the stridency that dominated the debate during these months.